[This is an important article by Biplap, a member of the Secretariat and Political Bureau of the UCPN(Maoist), and is most likely a disguised polemic against rightist forces in the party. He stresses the issue of the internal and international situations for the advance of the revolution--though he underestimates the danger of an Indian economic blockade and military intervention in the event of a Maoist victory or major Maoist advances through re-establishing the People's War.
Biplap also discusses the key role of the reactionary, ex-royalist Nepal Army. However he puts forth two different positions on the army. First, he writes that "we will have to fight with army if we want to complete revolution" and speaks of the need to foster splits in the army. On the other hand, he writes that the army is a nationalist force and that a "front between Maoist and Nepal Army is possible for national independence"--a position which leads away from the necessity to re-estabish the People's War in order to complete the new democratic revolution.--ed.]
Can We Go Ahead?
by Netra Bikram Chanda “Biplap”
The debate in Nepal is on whether revolution is possible or not. The debate is not only ideological and general assumption; rather, it is centered on the question whether there is possibility to increase intervention in the central power state or not. Two sharp analyses have emerged on the issue. They are for and against.
The analytical perspective that sees revolution as impossible:
One of the analytical perspectives is that the revolt is impossible. Yes, it seems so from that side of perspective. This analysis has emerged mainly from the side of some leftist intellectual politicians and analysts. They have given the following reasons to justify this logic.
Unfavorable international situation-
Favorable international situation is needed for the completion of revolution. For that, there should be a crisis in the centre of capitalism and unfavorable situation should have created against them. Moreover, there should be crisis in India, America and China for the completion of revolution in a small and poor country like Nepal. Otherwise, these power centres interfere over Nepal and revolution can not succeed. Continue reading